Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Union Pacific Says Atty's Status Requires Allen Matkins DQ

By Bonnie Eslinger · October 25, 2023, 3:55 PM EDT

Freight rail operator Union Pacific urged a California federal judge to disqualify Allen Matkins attorneys representing the defendants in its environmental contamination lawsuit, arguing that a conflicted lawyer who purportedly retired...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Brief

Case Information

Case Title

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Robert E. Hill, et al

Case Number

5:21-cv-03216

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Environmental Matters

Date Filed

April 30, 2021

Recent Articles By Bonnie

October 21, 2025
Apartments.com Operator CoStar Beats Video Privacy Suit
July 15, 2025
Ex-NY Attorney Pleads Guilty To Stealing $4.7M From Clients
June 18, 2025
State Farm Likely To Face 200K Calif. Homeowner Class
June 10, 2025
9th Circ. Revives Real Estate Investor Securities Suit, Again
May 20, 2025
FTC Case Against Greystar Stayed For Settlement Talks
May 01, 2025
Masonry Exec Cops To $52M Amtrak Program Bribery Scheme
April 22, 2025
Wyndham Must Face Suit Alleging It Enabled Sex Trafficking
March 27, 2025
Whistleblowers Seek Bigger Cut Of Tetra Tech Deal With Navy
January 31, 2025
9th Circ. Affirms Mormon Church's Win In Tithing Fraud Case
November 01, 2024
CFPB Inks Deal With Townstone Over Redlining Claims