Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

'Hotel For Pets' Not An Actual Hotel, NJ Tax Court Says

By Kyle Jahner · May 31, 2017, 4:18 PM EDT

A pet hotel is not equivalent to a human hotel, a New Jersey Tax Court judge said in an opinion posted Tuesday, ruling in a property valuation dispute that a dog...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Recent Articles By Kyle

April 18, 2018
Senators Ask FCC For New Robocall Rules, Introduce Bills
March 15, 2018
DC Circ. Asks FERC Why Utility's Potential Recoupment Cut
July 24, 2017
Ga. City Says Utility Policies Don't Target Minorities
June 08, 2017
Moody's Slams Bid To Revive Securities Ratings FCA Suit
May 30, 2017
Supreme Court Passes On Protest Of Calif. City Special Tax
May 03, 2017
Insurer Must Pay Tax Debt Before Policyholder: 3rd Circ.
April 26, 2017
Watchdog Wants Senate Probe Of Trump DC Hotel Ethics
April 24, 2017
Montreal Synagogue Eviction Dispute Sent To NY Arbiters
April 20, 2017
Mich. Appeals Court Tosses Set-Aside Of Tax Foreclosure
March 17, 2017
Class Member Appeals 'Token' $9.6M NJ Lien Bid-Rigging Deal

'Hotel For Pets' Not An Actual Hotel, NJ Tax Court Says

Related Sections

Recent Articles By Kyle