January 29, 2021
Frasco v. Flo Health, Inc.
Case Number:
3:21-cv-00757
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Adamski Moroski
- Benesch
- Berger Montague
- Coblentz Patch
- Cooley LLP
- Dechert LLP
- Gibson Dunn
- Hangley Aronchick
- Hinkle Shanor
- Hunton Andrews
- Kirby McInerney
- Labaton Keller
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Offices of Ronald A. Marron
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Paul Weiss
- RJM Litigation Group
- Robins Kaplan
- Spector Roseman
- Squire Patton
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
September 26, 2025
Meta Set To Appeal Flo Privacy Verdict As Users Seek Billions
Meta is gearing up to appeal a California federal jury verdict that found it liable for using a data analytics tool to illegally retrieve sensitive health data from users of the popular menstrual tracking app Flo, the company disclosed in a posttrial filing in which the plaintiffs separately asked the court to award statutory damages that could reach the billions.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login