Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Investment Firm Says Insurer 'Blindsided' It With Litigation

By Angela Childers · December 17, 2021, 6:18 PM EST

A real estate investment firm urged a California judge to reject its insurer's demand that it repay $2.5 million in defense costs from a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, arguing...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Motion

Case Information

Case Title

Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. SLRA Inc. et al

Case Number

3:19-cv-06131

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Date Filed

September 26, 2019

Recent Articles By Angela

March 24, 2022
'Hamilton' Production Co. Loses Bid For COVID Coverage
March 23, 2022
State Farm Must Defend Insured Jailed In Murder-For-Hire Plot
March 21, 2022
Car Dealer Can't Ignore Exclusion In TCPA Suit, Insurer Says
March 18, 2022
Insurers May Face More Exposure In Suits After Sandy Hook
March 15, 2022
Condiment Co. Not Covered In BIPA Class Action, Insurer Says
March 08, 2022
Insurers Hope Fla. Bills Will Aid Property Policy Woes
March 03, 2022
Insurers Back States' Push For Suit Funding Transparency
February 27, 2022
Greater PFAS Scrutiny Has Manufacturers, Insurers Worried
February 18, 2022
Parents' Surety Claims Against Schools Unlikely To Succeed
February 11, 2022
Texas '8 Corners' Ruling Adds Wrinkle To Coverage Fights