Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Insurer Says Related Acts Mean No $10M Settlement Coverage

By Josh Liberatore · February 14, 2022, 8:45 PM EST

A lone excess insurer asked a North Carolina federal judge for an early win in its suit seeking to avoid covering part of a doormaker's $40 million securities class action settlement,...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Motion

Case Information

Case Title

Travelers Casualty and Surety Company v. Jeld-Wen Holding, Inc. et al

Case Number

3:21-cv-00173

Court

North Carolina Western

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Date Filed

April 19, 2021

Recent Articles By Josh

March 17, 2023
Insurer Can Bring Suit To Avoid Covering Rape Claims
March 17, 2023
Insurer, Brokers Want Out Of Ex-NFL Player's Coverage Suit
March 16, 2023
Failed Banks Should Be Covered For Class Actions, Attys Say
March 15, 2023
Calif. Bank Seeks $1M In Coverage For Wire Fraud Scheme
March 14, 2023
Insurer's Win Thrown Out In Tax Firm Crime Coverage Suit
March 13, 2023
Insurer Settles With Builder Booted From High-Rise Project
March 10, 2023
Condo Board Accuses Travelers Of Abruptly Pulling Coverage
March 09, 2023
Allstate Must Add UIM Coverage To Policy, 4th Circ. Told
March 09, 2023
Broker Can't Trim $10M Insurance Suit, Staffing Co. Says
March 08, 2023
4th Circ. Gives Insurers Hope In Towers Watson Bump-Up Row