Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Pa. High Court Cold On Couple's UIM Coverage Argument

By Josh Liberatore · November 29, 2022, 5:07 PM EST

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court justices seemed poised Tuesday to reject a couple's appeal seeking an additional $100,000 in underinsured motorist coverage from State Farm, questioning an attorney's argument that the removal of...

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Recent Articles By Josh

March 17, 2023
Insurer Can Bring Suit To Avoid Covering Rape Claims
March 17, 2023
Insurer, Brokers Want Out Of Ex-NFL Player's Coverage Suit
March 16, 2023
Failed Banks Should Be Covered For Class Actions, Attys Say
March 15, 2023
Calif. Bank Seeks $1M In Coverage For Wire Fraud Scheme
March 14, 2023
Insurer's Win Thrown Out In Tax Firm Crime Coverage Suit
March 13, 2023
Insurer Settles With Builder Booted From High-Rise Project
March 10, 2023
Condo Board Accuses Travelers Of Abruptly Pulling Coverage
March 09, 2023
Allstate Must Add UIM Coverage To Policy, 4th Circ. Told
March 09, 2023
Broker Can't Trim $10M Insurance Suit, Staffing Co. Says
March 08, 2023
4th Circ. Gives Insurers Hope In Towers Watson Bump-Up Row

Pa. High Court Cold On Couple's UIM Coverage Argument

Related Sections

Recent Articles By Josh