EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.
Case Number:
5:20-cv-01934
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 04, 2021
Insurers Burn Cookware Co.'s Coverage Bid In Frying Pan Suit
A Pennsylvania federal judge has freed a trio of insurers from having to cover Tristar Products Inc. in a proposed class action over allegedly defective nonstick frying pans, saying the underlying litigation does not allege any unforeseeable wrongdoing on Tristar's part.
-
October 30, 2020
Cookware Co. Fights Insurer's Bid To Dodge Frying Pan Suit
Cookware maker Tristar Products Inc. said Evanston Insurance Co. and a Hiscox insurance unit must defend it in a proposed class action over allegedly defective nonstick frying pans, arguing on Friday that it's too early for the insurers to shirk obligations.
-
October 01, 2020
Insurer Says It Needn't Cover Defective Frying Pan Class Suit
Evanston Insurance Co. urged a Pennsylvania federal court Wednesday to rule that it doesn't have to defend or indemnify Tristar Products Inc. in a suit alleging it sold defective nonstick frying pans, saying the underlying suit never alleged an accident, which is a precondition for coverage.
-
April 17, 2020
Insurer: Claims Don't Stick In Faulty Frying Pan Class Suit
Evanston Insurance Co. is asking a Pennsylvania federal court to rule that it doesn't have to cover Tristar Products Inc. in a suit alleging it sold defective nonstick frying pans, saying the company's insurance policy only covers bodily injury or property damage claims.