Vizio, Inc. v. Navigators Insurance Company et al
Case Number:
2:20-cv-06864
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 11, 2022
Vizio Plans To Appeal Axed $17M Privacy Coverage Suit
Vizio notified a California federal judge that it will appeal his decision to toss a lawsuit that sought to force the TV maker's excess insurer to contribute coverage to a $17 million settlement in a multidistrict litigation that accused the company of selling data without consumers' consent.
-
July 19, 2022
Arch Insurance Beats Vizio's Suit Over $17M Privacy Deal
A California federal judge Tuesday tossed for good Vizio Inc.'s lawsuit seeking to force its excess insurer, Arch Insurance Co., to cover a $17 million settlement in multidistrict litigation accusing the TV maker of selling data without consumers' consent.
-
December 21, 2021
Vizio Says Arch Insurance Can't Duck Smart TV MDL Coverage
Vizio said it didn't need to notify its excess insurer, Arch Insurance Co., that coverage with its primary insurer had been exhausted, despite Arch's insistence that it was never notified of the exhaustion from underlying multidistrict litigation accusing the TV maker of selling data without consumers' consent.
-
November 16, 2021
Insurer Slams Vizio's Bid For $17M Privacy Deal Coverage
Navigators Insurance Co. told a California federal court that it doesn't need to help Vizio cover a $17 million deal following multidistrict litigation accusing the TV maker of selling data without consumers' consent, citing an invasion of privacy exclusion in Vizio's policy.
-
May 05, 2021
Excess Insurer Defeats Vizio's Suit Over $17M Privacy Deal
A California federal judge has freed Arch Insurance Co. from having to cover Vizio Inc.'s $17 million settlement in multidistrict litigation accusing the TV maker of selling data without consumers' consent, finding the excess insurer has no duty to provide a defense.
-
August 03, 2020
Vizio Sues Insurers For Coverage Of $17M Privacy Deal
Vizio Inc. has sued two insurers in California federal court, alleging "malicious" conduct in their refusal to indemnify the TV maker for a $17 million settlement of a 2018 multidistrict litigation accusing the company of selling data on consumers' viewing habits without their consent.