Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now.

Excess Insurer Says Winery's Wildfire Damage Not On Its Tab

By Shane Dilworth · August 3, 2021, 1:56 PM EDT

An excess insurer wants to squeeze out of covering damages to a winery caused by a wildfire, saying the establishment has already received $8.3 million from its primary insurer....

To view the full article, register now.

Try a seven day FREE Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Documents

Complaint

Case Information

Case Title

Kinsale Insurance Company v. Fairwinds Estate Winery LLC

Case Number

3:21-cv-05968

Court

California Northern

Nature of Suit

Insurance

Date Filed

August 02, 2021

Recent Articles By Shane

February 07, 2024
Insurer Asks 9th Circ. To Rehear Wildfire Pollution Ruling
February 06, 2024
4th Circ. Cites W.Va. Justices As It Affirms Coverage Win
February 02, 2024
9th Circ.'s Opioid Ruling Packs Limited Punch
January 29, 2024
Justices' Pass On Fracking Coverage Unsurprising To Attys
January 23, 2024
Split 9th Circ. Says Insurer Must Defend Cleanup Injury Suit
January 22, 2024
Justices Won't Review $13M Well Damage Coverage Denial
January 10, 2024
Panel Unsure If McKesson Accidentally Oversupplied Opioids
January 09, 2024
Insurers Must Cover Loss Of 500K Bushels Of Soybeans
January 08, 2024
9th Circ. Must Define 'Occurrence' In Opioid Coverage Fight
January 08, 2024
High Court Won't Review Tossing Of UPS' Dispute With Airline