In re: Google Digital Advertising Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:21-md-03010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation, Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- King & Spalding
- Shaffer Lombardo
- Vorys
- Williams & Connolly
- Herman Jones LLP
- Wilson Sonsini
- Boies Schiller
- Axinn Veltrop
- Gustafson Gluek
- Norton Rose
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Forman Watkins
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Yetter Coleman
- Girard Sharp
- McHugh Fuller
- Cera LLP
- Lockridge Grindal
- deLeeuw Law
- Webber & Thies
- Crueger Dickinson
- DiCello Levitt
- Cooper & Kirk
- Silverman Thompson
- Berger Singerman
- Swanson Martin
- Shinder Cantor
- Zwerling Schachter
- Burke LLP
- Wexler Boley
- Kressin Meador
- Ross Aronstam
- McCorvey Law LLC
- Fitzsimmons Law Firm
- Lanier Law Firm
- Flaherty Sensabaugh
- Grabar Law
- Korein Tillery
- Bartko Pavia
- Capes Sokol
- Dugan Law Firm
- Free & Fair Litigation
- Hartley LLP
- Hausfeld LLP
- Sumner Meeker
- Keller Postman
- Gibson Dunn
- Cravath Swaine
- Mogin Law
- Kellogg Hansen
- MoloLamken
- NastLaw
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Bryan Cave
- Taus Cebulash
- Baker Botts
- Farrell & Fuller
- Radice Law Firm
- Thompson Hine
- Robbins Geller
- Freshfields
- Berger Montague
- Kirby McInerney
- Greene Ketchum
- Hissam Forman
Companies
- Havas Media Group
- SPX Corporation
- Google LLC
- Alphabet Inc.
- YouTube Inc.
- Meta Platforms Inc.
- Gannett Co. Inc.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 18, 2021
Most Of States' Google Ad Monopoly Complaint Unsealed
A New York federal judge on Friday unsealed most of the amended Texas-led antitrust complaint challenging Google's display advertising practices, saying some Google employee names and contact information should be redacted but Google's internal revenue figures and an agreement with Facebook should not be afforded the same privacy.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next →