Insurers Tell 9th Circ. No Ad Injury In MGA's Bratz Fight

Law360, New York (December 19, 2012, 6:54 PM ET) -- Two insurers asked the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday to overturn rulings requiring them to defend MGA Entertainment Inc. in an epic trade secrets battle with Mattel Inc. over the popular Bratz doll line, arguing Mattel didn't allege a covered advertising injury.

In their opening briefs, primary insurers Lexington Insurance Co. and Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co. said a California federal court had mistakenly ruled that Mattel's fourth amended answer and counterclaims created the potential for coverage under the personal and advertising injury provisions of their...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required