A virtual reality startup that has received backing from Google, Qualcomm and Warner Bros. has sued two of its former top executives in California federal court, saying the pair stole trade secrets and plotted to start a rival company.
A California federal judge Friday said Target and ViewSonic must reveal settlement agreements with defendants in multidistrict litigation over alleged price-fixing in the market for cathode ray tubes in televisions, saying the settlement amounts will help remaining defendants “decide whether to proceed to trial.”
A California federal judge on Thursday largely denied Pacific Gas & Electric Co.’s bid for certain documents in the government’s suit over a deadly 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion, but said the government must hand over ministerial grand jury records.
A California state judge recently disqualified Gibson Dunn as defense counsel for McDermott Will & Emery LLP in a malpractice matter, a finding that legal experts say stands as a warning in matters where third parties end up with privileged emails in their hands.
Uber and drivers in a pair of high-profile California class actions fired back at a growing number of objectors to the pending $100 million settlement Friday that would end claims that the ride-hailing giant misclassified drivers as independent contractors, maintaining the settlement is in fact on solid legal ground.
Claims by a proposed class of Jeep owners that Fiat Chrysler botched a recall fix should be dismissed for lacking even basic allegations, or else moved to a New York federal bankruptcy court since the vehicles at issue were made by now-defunct Chrysler LLC, the automaker said Friday.
A California federal judge refused Thursday to find that Ericsson Inc. charged a Chinese mobile phone developer an excessive rate for standard-essential patents for wireless technology, saying it would be unfair to apply an arbitration decision issued in a licensing dispute between Ericsson and another company.
A California appeals court Thursday said cash, meal and travel payments a former monsignor for the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles provided to his abuse victims in the 1970s and 1980s don’t qualify as compensation pausing the allowable time period for the victims to sue.
A pesticide company urged the Ninth Circuit Thursday to reverse an Oregon federal court's decision that Crum & Forster and two other insurers don't have to cover its settlement of litigation accusing it of misusing a business partner's trademark, asserting that the underlying suit claims an advertising injury falling within the insurers' policies.
The Ninth Circuit Thursday reversed a lower court decision denying arbitration in a proposed class action claiming two mobile messaging companies duped consumers into pay for services, saying the trial court should determine whether the lead plaintiff agreed to arbitrate and whether that extended to the service-facilitator defendants.
Environmentalists on Thursday said they’ll ask the Ninth Circuit to overturn a California federal judge’s decision not to block the U.S. Export-Import Bank from completing two loans worth $4.8 billion to two Australian liquefied natural gas projects in the Great Barrier Reef.
Goodwin Procter LLP has bolstered its Silicon Valley employment practice with a former Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP attorney with experience advising companies on compensation and tax compliance matters in life sciences, technology, private equity and real estate, the firm said.
American water polo’s governing body on Friday moved a California federal court to dismiss a putative class action by a mother of an injured player claiming it didn’t do enough to prevent concussions, saying she misunderstands how California law assigns liability for injuries.
ADT Security Services was hit with a proposed class action in California federal court Thursday by a man who claims his house was burglarized because his defective home security system failed to detect the breaking of a glass window.
The man leading a proposed class action claiming Facebook violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unauthorized text message warnings still hasn’t proven they were generated automatically, which got his complaint nixed the first time around, the social media giant told a California federal judge Thursday.
Merrill Lynch, Citigroup and others involved with a West Coast cancer-treatment company's $240 million initial public offering last year allegedly overstated its financial prospects, which led to a massive drop in its stock price, investors said in a putative class action filed on Wednesday in California state court.
With a Thursday jury verdict that Google’s use of Oracle’s copyrighted Java software code was protected by the fair use doctrine, the tech giant and its supporters won a huge battle, but the war is far from over.
An attorney who successfully overturned a sanction against him for his firm's filing of a frivolous adversary complaint in a California woman's bankruptcy needn’t publicly report that he’s been sanctioned, since such a statement would be factually inaccurate, the Ninth Circuit ruled Thursday.
Embeddable communications platform Twilio disclosed plans for a nominal $100 million initial public offering to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Thursday, becoming the first so-called unicorn — a private startup valued at at least $1 billion — to place its sights on the open market in 2016.
U.S. offshore regulators on Friday revived permitting hydraulic fracturing and other drilling activities in the Pacific Ocean after concluding those activities won't significantly impact the environment, a move blasted by environmentalists who vowed to take the government to court.
During complex litigation, litigants often retain consulting experts to help them understand any intricate aspects of social and natural sciences present in a case, but the federal rules provide no such mechanism for the presiding judge. That is where technical advisers come in, say attorneys at K&L Gates LLP.
Following the lead of at least 33 other states, Tennessee's new mass transit focused public-private partnership law should offer a solution to Nashville's growing traffic problem without dipping too deep into public coffers, say Zachary Jones and Cassidy Rosenthal at Stites & Harbison PLLC.
Courts have differed in determining whether certain negligence claims against health care providers sound in professional or ordinary negligence, and accordingly, which statute of limitations to apply. Hopefully, the California Supreme Court's decision in Flores v. Presbyterian International Community Hospital has established a test for professional negligence that fits “just right,” says David Moreshead at Horvitz & Levy LLP.
Courts often require parties to develop a joint e-discovery plan. But even when they are not court-imposed, parties should consider using joint e-discovery plans to promote transparency and streamline the discovery process, say Anthony Rospert and Jake Evans of Thompson Hine LLP.
Navigating the discretionary review procedures before the Supreme Courts of California and Texas is tricky, and the odds of review low. M.C. Sungaila and Lynne Liberato of Haynes and Boone share seven ways to beat the odds in each court.
In honor of our 21st installment of "And Now A Word From The Panel," this month’s column will address a burgeoning category of cases subject to multidistrict litigations during the 21st century — cyber MDLs, or more specifically, cases arising from an alleged data privacy breach, says Alan Rothman of Kaye Scholer LLP.
When partners dissolve a business or are forced to part with property, it’s not uncommon that one party is too stubborn to try to work things out. Byron Moldo of Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP describes the role a court-appointed partition referee can play under California law in pushing past the stubbornness.
While the California Court of Appeal's holding in Davis v. Honeywell can and should be limited to the specific facts and expert testimony in that case, the decision serves as a warning that courts may not always vigorously enforce their responsibility to screen expert opinions, which could open the door for plaintiffs in asbestos cases to depend on testimony that may not be entirely reliable, say attorneys at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission recently affirmed its role in ensuring reasonable rates for wholesale sales of electric energy in Ohio. But state utilities seek to further their objectives without invoking FERC jurisdictional issues, and if other states aim to advance their public policy initiatives using similar methods, it could impose higher costs on captive retail customers, say Joseph Fagan and David Doot at Day Pitney LLP.
Nowhere is the attractiveness of law firms as cybercrime targets more evident than the recent Mossack Fonseca hack, believed to be the most significant data theft event in history. Firms represent a treasure trove of information and historically have had dreadful cybersecurity practices. There has been some progress, but firms can also commit to better defending their information by taking a simple, three-step approach, says Sean D... (continued)