After nearly a year of legal and political stumbling over the environmental review of California Pacific Medical Center’s $2 billion hospital expansion plan, the project on Thursday won back expired approvals from the San Francisco planning commission.
A former Time Warner Cable Inc. call center employee filed a putative class action against the telecommunications giant Tuesday in California court, claiming the company has failed to pay employees proper overtime rates and wages they were owed upon termination.
A California judge on Thursday indicated he will approve a $4.3 million settlement of a consumer class action alleging the maker of the popular hair-straightening product Brazilian Blowout failed to disclose it emits formaldehyde gas, saying the parties had resolved his concerns about the proposed deal.
Nokia Corp. hit HTC Corp. with a patent infringement suit in California federal court Thursday, accusing the Taiwan-based mobile phone and tablet manufacturer and its American subsidiary of infringing three Nokia patents through its sale of numerous smartphones.
The Ninth Circuit ruled Thursday that a broke law school graduate who amassed $85,000 in student debt wasn't obligated to repay the loans because he couldn't find a job that would pay him enough to satisfy loan payments exceeding $800 per month.
A California federal judge agreed Thursday to temporarily stay Pragmatus AV's case accusing Yahoo Inc.'s Messenger of infringing two communications technology patents in order to give a Delaware court time to rule on Yahoo's motion to transfer a nearly identical case to the Golden State.
The trustee overseeing the California "Girls Gone Wild" bankruptcy derided efforts by founder Joe Francis to halt the bankruptcy of a subsidiary involved in the purportedly fraudulent overseas transfer of company trademarks on Thursday, saying his emergency motion was filed an hour and a half too late.
A California federal judge Tuesday approved a joint dismissal of Millennium Laboratories Inc.'s claims that two insurers wrongfully refused to pay for the company's defense in separate disputes with competitors that allegedly used kickbacks and confidential information to steal Millennium's customers.
A California federal judge Thursday told SanDisk Corp. and PNY Technologies Inc. to hash out their discovery issues themselves, after PNY accused SanDisk of improperly delaying the discovery schedule in a suit accusing SanDisk of threatening litigation to force rivals into anti-competitive patent licensing agreements.
The heirs of Superman co-creator Joseph Shuster did not agree to release their statutory right to reclaim Superman copyrights in a 1992 deal with DC Comics, the heirs told the Ninth Circuit on Thursday in a bid to overturn a victory for the publisher in their long-running copyright fight.
A Miss USA beauty pageant official urged a California appellate court Thursday to toss a breach of contract suit, arguing that a trial court erroneously greenlighted claims that she broke a secret agreement by talking to TMZ about a beauty queen's sex tape.
The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday overturned a labor union's successful challenge to Idaho's recent expansion of its right-to-work law, ruling the district court needed to determine whether the state's attorney general had authority to enforce the statutes before the case could proceed.
The Ninth Circuit on Wednesday resurrected Affiliated FM Insurance Co.'s suit alleging LTK Consulting Services Inc.'s work on the Seattle monorail led to a 2004 fire, finding there were still too many disputed facts to determine whether Affiliated's claims were time-barred.
A California federal judge on Wednesday rejected The Coca-Cola Co.'s bid to shut down a nationwide class action accusing it of text-spamming consumers, saying the complaint's lack of specific detail can be cleared up during discovery and is not grounds for dismissal.
Kramer Laboratories Inc. on Wednesday settled a proposed class action accusing it of tricking consumers into believing its Fungi-Nail products can cure nail fungus.
Target Corp., Rite Aid Corp. and CVS Caremark Corp. were hit with a proposed class action in California state court Wednesday, accusing them of using a state Medicaid suspension list to wrongly void non-Medicaid prescriptions written by suspended doctors and slandering the doctors to patients.
Cooley LLP said Wednesday it added a DLA Piper attorney with expertise in environmental, product liability and real estate suits to ramp up its national litigation practice in San Diego.
A proposed class of Bank of America NA customers failed Wednesday to revive their suit over the bank's service fees for payroll debit cards, after the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court's ruling that the National Bank Act preempts the suit's state law fraud and unfair competition claims.
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth PC has added a former Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP partner specializing in labor and employment law as a shareholder at its Santa Barbara, Calif., office, the firm announced on Wednesday.
A California federal judge refused Wednesday to dismiss Nuance Communications Inc.'s patent infringement suit against Lexmark International Inc. and Abbyy Software House, and ordered Abbyy to fork over more than $130,000 in sanctions for its conduct during the discovery process.
Property owners rarely succeed with regulatory takings claims — but securing a victory on liability and a damages award for a temporary regulatory taking, well, that is more in the realm of unicorns and the Loch Ness Monster. That all changed recently when the California Court of Appeal issued its decision in Lockaway Storage v. County of Alameda, say attorneys with Nossaman LLP.
With the enactment of Civil Code Section 2782.05, the California Legislature has created a new regime to govern a subcontractor's duty to defend a general contractor or construction manager on most nonresidential projects. While this new regime appears intended to benefit construction participants, its lack of guidance will likely result in disagreements and litigation among the participants, say attorneys with Jones Day.
In its recent decision in Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, the Ninth Circuit made clear that courts must look beyond labels in agreements and evaluate the substance of the rights actually assigned in order to determine whether an assignee has standing to pursue a claim for copyright infringement, say Benjamin Marks and Elisabeth Sperle of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP.
The long-awaited proposed reforms to California's Proposition 65 are welcome and needed as they would greatly reduce the number of frivolous Prop. 65 lawsuits and alleviate the defense costs for manufacturers, says Mark Johnson of Alston & Bird LLP.
The pros of using predictive coding far outweigh the cons. Given the heavy pressure on law firms and in-house counsel to reduce discovery costs, as well as the Justice Department's recent stance on the subject, it appears predictive coding will continue to emerge from the obscure world of legal technology to the mainstream of legal practice, say Michael Moscato and Myles Bartley of Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle LLP.
When U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald dismissed a consolidated, multidistrict batch of antitrust and racketeering suits in Manhattan earlier this spring, she suggested plaintiffs seeking to recover from banking giants at the heart of the interest rate-fixing scandal might have better luck with securities fraud claims. But those plaintiffs will need to be lucky indeed. Two recent developments show that obstacles are inherent and, perhaps, insurmountable, say attorneys with Choate Hall & Stewart LLP.
In an effort to combat the $32 billion human trafficking industry, California law now requires certain businesses to post public notices regarding slavery and human trafficking. By doing so, the recently passed bill has effectively made these establishments aware that they may already be unwitting participants in the human trafficking industry, say attorneys with Gordon & Rees LLP.
The California Supreme Court's upcoming decision in Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Swift Distribution Inc. will resolve a hot debate about the scope of implied disparagement liability under California law, likely determining whether insurers must defend lawsuits involving allegations of intellectual property infringement, unfair competition and false advertising, says Tyler Gerking of Farella Braun & Martel LLP.
Recently, two firms have filed class actions against three Catholic Church-affiliated health care facilities, claiming that their pension plans should be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. These cases could have a profound effect on all church plan sponsors, regardless of whether they have previously obtained favorable church plan rulings, say attorneys with Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.
The California Air Resources Board has again been sued over its implementation of the Global Warming Solutions Act in Morning Star Packing Co., et al. v. CARB, which resembles an earlier action brought by the California Chamber of Commerce. Petitioners of both cases face the difficult challenge of convincing the court to derail a massive regulatory scheme that is now well underway, say attorneys with Marten Law PLLC.