Intellectual Property

  • November 25, 2015

    GSI Wins Nearly $1M At Calif. Trade Secrets Trial

    A federal jury in California found on Wednesday that a chip design company was liable for breach of contract in a trade secrets suit brought by chipmaker GSI Technology and awarded GSI nearly $1 million in damages, according to court documents.

  • November 25, 2015

    MedTel Found In Contempt Again In Heart Monitor IP Fight

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Monday issued a second order finding heart monitoring company MedTel24 Inc. in contempt of a consent judgment in a patent infringement case brought by CardioNet LLC, but he stopped short of issuing sanctions against it.

  • November 25, 2015

    Luxury Cos. Win $64M Default Against Counterfeiter

    A New York federal judge on Tuesday granted fashion brands Cartier International AG, Alfred Dunhill Ltd., Chloe SAS and others a $64 million default judgment after finding the sole remaining defendant in the case liable for infringing their trademarks and permanently barred the John Doe from continuing to do so.

  • November 25, 2015

    Apple's PTAB Triumph Can't Stand, Arendi Tells Fed. Circ.

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred in invalidating an Arendi S.A.R.L. computer data patent challenged by Apple, Google and Motorola by basing its decision in part on “common sense” rather than on concrete evidence, the company told the Federal Circuit on Tuesday.

  • November 25, 2015

    LG Says Toshiba Samsung Doesn't Have Patent Rights

    LG Electronics asked a Delaware federal court to toss a suit filed by Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Wednesday, saying the company never secured rights needed to claim infringement of patents for disc and optical drives.

  • November 25, 2015

    Honda, Others Hit With IP Suits Over Remote Control Apps

    Honda, Ford, Mercedes-Benz and a host of other automakers were hit Wednesday with lawsuits in Texas federal court by a device patent company claiming all of the manufacturers are infringing on a patent that covers customized consumer products created over the Internet with apps that control car functions.

  • November 25, 2015

    Pozen Fires Back At Bass Group's Vimovo IPR Petition

    Pozen Inc. has urged the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to reject the latest attempt by an organization tied to hedge fund manager Kyle Bass to obtain an America Invents Act review of a patent covering the arthritis medication Vimovo, saying Bass' group didn’t show that it will succeed in invalidating the patent.

  • November 25, 2015

    Teikoku Loses Bid To Boot 12 Firms From Lidoderm MDL

    A California federal judge on Wednesday refused to disqualify 12 law firms representing retailers in pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation over the Lidoderm pain relief patch, saying plaintiffs’ attorneys’ use of a privileged document mistakenly handed over by Japanese drugmaker Teikoku did not warrant disqualification.

  • November 25, 2015

    Accused Infringers Rethink Declaratory Judgment Strategies

    With the Patent Trial and Appeal Board becoming a more popular avenue for attacking the validity of patents, accused infringers are filing fewer declaratory judgment actions in court, but attorneys say this type of preemptive suit still serves as an important litigation tool for gaining a favorable jurisdiction in a patent fight.

  • November 25, 2015

    Turtles Say SiriusXM Is Off Track On Fla. Property Law

    Members of The Turtles rock band argued Tuesday that Sirius XM Radio is employing a misguided “anything but Florida law” strategy to try to convince the Eleventh Circuit to affirm a lower court's finding that the band doesn't hold a performance right to their pre-1972 recordings.

  • November 25, 2015

    Medicines Co. Asks Fed. Circ. To Reopen IP Fight With Mylan

    The Medicines Co. on Tuesday asked the Federal Circuit to reopen a case in which it reversed an infringement ruling against Mylan Inc. for a patent for the anticoagulant Angiomax, as the court has agreed to reconsider the patent’s validity in another suit.

  • November 25, 2015

    Jury Wrongly Cleared Apple In Emblaze IP Suit, Fed. Circ. Told

    Israeli software firm Emblaze Ltd. has asked the Federal Circuit to toss a district court jury verdict finding Apple Inc. did not induce ESPN Inc., Major League Baseball and others to infringe the firm's video live-streaming technology, arguing that no reasonable jury could have come to that conclusion based on the claims and evidence.

  • November 25, 2015

    Big Labels Won't Get Higher Streaming Rates Than Indies

    With a much-anticipated ruling looming on how much webcasters like Pandora should pay in royalties over the next five years, the Register of Copyrights said Tuesday that major record companies should not be paid higher rates than independent labels.

  • November 25, 2015

    Brand Battles: Wal-Mart, American Airlines, Disney

    In Law360's latest roundup of new actions at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Wal-Mart "makes" a 3-D printing problem for itself, American Airlines clashes with Chevron over who has the "advantage," and Disney gets animated over a century-old fictional character.

  • November 25, 2015

    Sports Photogs Denied 'Sweeping' Memorabilia Ban In IP Suit

    Sports memorabilia sellers facing copyright infringement claims don’t have to halt all sales of photographs whose copyrights they don’t own, even though the photographers behind the lawsuit have “legitimate concerns” about memorabilia dealers violating an earlier court order, a Wisconsin federal judge said Wednesday.

  • November 25, 2015

    Fed. Circ. Rules PTAB Wrongly Axed Teleconferencing Patent

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board used an incorrect claim construction when it invalidated many claims of Straight Path IP Group Inc.'s online communication patent, the Federal Circuit ruled Wednesday in a rare instance of the court faulting the PTAB in an inter partes review.

  • November 25, 2015

    Kimberly-Clark Says Rival Recycling Arguments In Diaper Spat

    Kimberly-Clark urged a Wisconsin federal judge not to revive a rival’s claim that patent lawsuits instigated by the Pull-Ups maker demonstrate anti-competitive behavior, telling the judge Tuesday that First Quality is recycling old arguments.

  • November 25, 2015

    The MVPs Of IP Law

    The successes of these elite attorneys in high-stakes litigation earned them a spot in the Intellectual Property category of Law360's 2015 MVP Awards.

  • November 25, 2015

    Dr. Reddy's Denied Stay In AstraZeneca Purple Pill Row

    A Delaware federal judge on Wednesday shot down Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Inc.’s attempt to keep selling its generic version of AstraZeneca’s trademarked purple pill, the heartburn drug Nexium, following a temporary restraining order against the Indian company earlier this month.

  • November 25, 2015

    Bass Takes Aim At Citius Drug Patent Under His Own Name

    Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass and self-described "patent troll" Erich Spangenberg challenged another drug patent Tuesday, this time taking aim at Citius Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s obesity drug Suprenza with an inter partes review petition filed under their own names, rather than the group they formed to challenge other patents.

Expert Analysis

  • OPINION: In Search Of Our Best Law Firm Selves

    James Maiwurm.jpg

    Several developments over the past few months caught the eye of Jim Maiwurm, chairman emeritus of Squire Patton Boggs. Try as he might, he could not resist the temptation to comment on a few — such as the expansion of the Dentons “polycentric” empire, a confused verein controversy, and provocative suggestions that the law firm partnership model is a dinosaur.

  • A Closer Look At Fed. Circ.’s Ruling In ClearCorrect

    Lyle B. Vander Schaaf

    The Federal Circuit's majority opinion in ClearCorrect seems to provide a sweeping pronouncement regarding U.S. International Trade Commission jurisdiction, but the ITC likely will read the opinion narrowly to simply stand for the proposition that, where the only imported item is digital data that is transferred electronically from outside the U.S., the agency does not have jurisdiction, say Lyle Vander Schaaf and Yashas Honasoge o... (continued)

  • Getting The Last Word In PTAB Trials

    Gerald M. Murphy Jr.

    The last substantive filing that is allowed in trials before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board will generally either be the petitioner’s reply or the patent owner’s reply in support of its motion to amend. Nevertheless, procedures are available after the last reply. Gerald Murphy and Lynde Herzbach of Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch LLP review the types of evidence and arguments submitted in “rebuttal” filings.

  • New Federal Rules Acknowledge It’s Time To Drop The 'E'

    Gregory Leighton

    The amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure scheduled to take effect Dec. 1 are designed to usher in a new era in the U.S. litigation system, this time acknowledging that what was once known as “e-discovery” is now just discovery. The amendments are sweeping in scope, but none is more important than the revised Rule 37(e), say Gregory Leighton and Eric Choi of Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP.

  • Giving Thanks For The Patent Pro Bono Program

    Tammy L. Tanner

    I recently had the opportunity to do pro bono patent prosecution for an independent inventor through my firm. I found the process to be enjoyable and fulfilling, and came away with some tips for working with someone who is new to the patent prosecution process, says Tammy Tanner of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP.

  • C-E-R-T! Why Cheerleader Uniform Suit Belongs In High Court

    Edward Maluf

    The Sixth Circuit held last August in Varsity Brands v. Star Athletica that certain design elements of copyright-registered cheerleading uniforms were indeed copyrightable because those elements were conceptually separable from the uniforms themselves. The case provides an opportunity for the U.S. Supreme Court to craft a less subjective and more predictive rule for fashion designs, say Edward Maluf and Amy Abeloff of Seyfarth Shaw LLP.

  • Some Potential Modern Uses For Submarine Patents

    James Yang

    Submarine patents have lost much of their luster because patent applications now have a limited shelf life of only 20 years upon filing and any continuation applications also have the same limited shelf life of 20 years calculated back from its earliest priority nonprovisional filing. Nevertheless, the benefits of a submarine patent may still be applicable in limited circumstances, says James Yang of Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker PC.

  • 5 Signs You Are Hiring The Wrong Patent Translator

    Michael Degn

    How do you know the translations of your patent applications are accurate? In most cases, you aren’t going to know until you face litigation by a company challenging your patent, and further scrutiny of the patent shows what you thought was covered isn’t. But there are some red flags to look for, says Michael Degn of MultiLing.

  • 3 Ways Technology Is Changing Law Office Designs


    A growing number of attorneys and firms are eschewing tradition by embracing technology to change not only the way we work, but also the way we organize our offices, says Anthony Johnson, founder and CEO of American Injury Attorney Group.

  • Courts To Police Direct Infringement Pleadings More Strictly

    Joel B. Ard

    Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will soon delete all the forms, including Form 18 — the model patent infringement pleading. Several earlier decisions that rejected or criticized Form 18 offer guidance to practitioners trying to predict proper pleading standards for complaints filed after Dec. 1, 2015, say Joel Ard and Benjamin Hodges of Foster Pepper PLLC.