A federal jury on Friday returned verdicts of “not guilty” for four out of five defendants accused of violating the Sherman Act by rigging the bid process for tax lien auctions in New Jersey between 1998 and 2009, finding one New Jersey-based independent contractor guilty of conspiracy.
Two New Jersey Devils fans asked a New Jersey federal judge on Friday to deny the hockey team’s bid to ice their amended putative class action alleging the team didn't fulfill its obligation to renew season tickets and is trying to control the resale ticket market.
Gloucester Titanium Co. has agreed to pay $1.5 million to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to cover remediation costs resulting from discharges of hazardous substances from its Camden County plant near the Delaware River.
Companies under the umbrella of Kinder Morgan Inc. will pay $20 million to New Jersey to exit federal litigation in which dozens of companies have been accused of polluting state waters with methyl tertiary butyl ether, or MTBE, a gasoline additive, according to a notice in the state register on Monday.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the appeal of both a manufacturer and refurbisher of seats on Canadian Pacific Railway trains that were found potentially liable for $2.7 million by the Third Circuit for supplying allegedly defective seats that led to train employee injuries.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the case of an attorney seeking to recoup millions for his role in developing a $2 billion New Jersey mall project in which he claims he was mistakenly labeled as a broker instead of a principal.
The distiller of Tito’s Handmade Vodka on Friday said that a proposed class action disputing whether the spirit is actually “handmade” should be thrown out of New Jersey federal court because the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim under the state’s Consumer Fraud Act.
An Acacia Research Corp. unit said Friday it has settled litigation and reached a patent license agreement with C.R. Bard Inc. to resolve patent litigation in Delaware and New Jersey federal courts.
The New Jersey attorney general’s office won't fight prosecutors' bid to stay consolidated putative class actions over the George Washington Bridge scandal, saying Thursday it takes no position on U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman's arguments that a stay is necessary to protect the integrity of a related criminal proceeding.
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday recused himself from a putative labor class action against an oil field services company being represented by Genova Burns LLC, the same firm that is also representing his nephews as they fight against a murder-suicide determination on their parents' cause of death.
New Jersey's top transportation official is stepping down to pursue opportunities in the private sector, just one year after being appointed to the post, Gov. Chris Christie's office announced late Friday.
Amtrak and federal and state agencies will push ahead with plans to build a new $20 billion passenger rail tunnel connecting New York and New Jersey, starting with an expedited environmental review, representatives for involved organizations confirmed Friday.
A single mother of two in New Jersey has sued the operator of for-profit career schools over its surgical technology program, claiming it raked in cash by duping students into taking unaccredited programs and misrepresenting their career prospects.
We R Wireless Inc., a New Jersey-based Verizon Wireless retailer, has agreed to pay $1.3 million to end a collective action alleging it misclassified employees as exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime requirements, according to a Thursday filing in federal court.
A group of hospitals sued the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in Washington federal court on Thursday, alleging that the agency had wrongly reduced Medicare payments to the hospitals for treating high numbers of low-income patients under a New Jersey charity program.
Bayer Corp. did not advertise its Phillips’ Colon Health probiotics as a disease-curing drug and had the proper research to substantiate advertised claims regarding its effectiveness, a New Jersey federal judge said in an opinion unsealed Thursday, nixing a complaint brought by the Federal Trade Commission.
A New Jersey state judge on Friday imposed a five-year prison sentence on former NFL player Irving Fryar and gave his mother three years of probation over defense attorneys' objections that a jury's guilty verdict in the duo's mortgage fraud trial went against the weight of evidence.
Day Pitney LLP on Friday announced the addition of a five-attorney team from Morristown, New Jersey-based Porzio Bromberg & Newman PC that will help strengthen its offerings in land use matters, redevelopment and other areas of real estate law.
A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision pushed open the door to salary disgorgement for swindled employers and may encourage more companies to aggressively seek restitution from disloyal employees, especially high-level decision makers.
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday refused to toss Geico's suit accusing the owners of a group of outpatient care facilities of defrauding the insurer in a kickback scheme, but agreed to stay the proceeding until the alleged ringleaders are sentenced in a related criminal suit.
Curtailing an aggressive loss theory that held defendants to more than the government’s loss in some fraud cases, the Third Circuit's recent decision in U.S. v. Nagle makes clear that when the government contracts for goods or services and receives them, the proper measure of loss is not the full value of the contract, say attorneys with Nixon Peabody LLP.
Justice Antonin Scalia often admits, “I’m a fed,” acknowledging that the U.S. Supreme Court is appointed, confirmed and vested with federal power. A critical counterbalance to that are state attorneys general, who uniquely, often singularly, come before the court to defend the interests of states. Here comes another big term for state AGs, says Joseph Jacquot, a partner with Foley & Lardner LLP and former deputy attorney general of Florida.
Following the Third Circuit's recent decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham, commentators far and wide have predicted gloom and doom for those responsible for corporate data security. Certainly, the FTC’s self-proclaimed position as the “data breach police” was validated by the decision, but the formulation of a general standard for data security is no more certain now than it ever has been, says John Hutchins of LeClairRyan.
After recently hearing a young trial lawyer start his opening statement with the Paul Harvey approach, I feel motivated to set out the reasons why defense lawyers should not use this technique anymore, says Dr. Ross Laguzza of R&D Strategic Solutions.
My hope is that this article will not be seen as a rant by a senior trial lawyer. The truth is that some things get worse with the passage of time and it should be fair to comment upon such deterioration, says Dennis Suplee, a partner and former chairman of Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP.
A recent Third Circuit decision in the bankruptcy case of LifeCare Holdings Inc. could have a profound effect on the structure of Section 363 sales. Using escrows to pay certain constituencies with new cash while essentially freezing out similarly ranked or senior stakeholders stands in stark contrast to the limitations imposed on Section 363 acquirers, say Lawrence Gelber and James Bentley of Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.
Unless a motion is made and granted for rehearing, Mirza v. Insurance Administrators of America Inc. is binding law in the Third Circuit, and all denial letters under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act must include any plan-imposed suit limitation deadline, say Robert Lesko and Joshua Bachrach of Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP.
A New Jersey federal court's recent decision in the Vehicle Carrier Services Antitrust Litigation is important as a confirmation that federal preemption remains a viable defense to state-law antitrust claims, notwithstanding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Oneok Inc. v. Learjet Inc., say John Longstreth and Allen Bachman of K&L Gates LLP.
Can lawyers advise clients to delete social media accounts? Change privacy settings to conceal prior posts? Clean up their postings in the future? On the heels of similar decisions in New York, North Carolina and Pennsylvania, a recent Florida Bar Professional Ethics Committee opinion offers insight into what crosses the line of spoliation of evidence, says Brian Karpf of Young Berman Karpf & Gonzalez PA.
New Jersey's most recent attempt to get around an unusual federal statute — that allows sports betting but prohibits states from authorizing it — by repealing all sports betting bans at casinos and racetracks was shut down by the Third Circuit, but it is unlikely that states will easily walk away from the potential to regulate, tax and benefit from a potential $380 billion market, says Christopher Soriano at Duane Morris LLP.