Plaintiffs Fail To Alter $90M Micron DRAM Settlement

Law360, New York (June 2, 2009, 12:00 AM EDT) -- Direct purchaser plaintiffs in massive dynamic random access memory antitrust litigation have lost their bid to alter a $90 million settlement with Micron Technology Inc., which they claim does not factor in all DRAM sales.

Judge Phyllis Hamilton of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California denied the plaintiffs' motion to alter judgment, arguing that the settlement amount was not based on a percentage of total DRAM sales to the direct purchasers, as the motion argued.

Furthermore, the settlement doesn’t provide much room...
To view the full article, register now.