Bilski Test Too Tough On Patent Eligibility: Briefs

By Erin Coe

Law360, New York (August 06, 2009, 7:50 PM ET) -- A group of software companies, an international association of intellectual property lawyers and others are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse a lower court’s decision in the Bilski case, which they claim establishes too rigid of a test for determining when business methods are patentable subject matter.

Separate amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court on Thursday on behalf of Armanta Inc. and other small and midsize software companies and the International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (AIPPI), a day after a...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

All fields required

  5. Required

Only Law360 gives you:

Non-stop coverage of high-stakes litigation across 30 practices

Real-time tracking and reports on 10,000+ companies, firms and industries

Over 80,000 attorney profiles with neutral data collected from active lawsuits

Research tools to find cases, court documents, attorneys and companies

Customized feeds and alerts that can easily be shared with colleagues

In-depth expert analysis from high-profile attorneys at top firms

Access to our vault with over 75,000 original articles