Case Study: Kentucky Speedway V. NASCAR

Law360, New York (January 25, 2010, 2:48 PM ET) -- The recent decision in Kentucky Speedway LLC v. National Association of Stock Car Auto Racing Inc., (Slip. Op. No. 08-5041, Dec. 11, 2009), sets a stringent standard for proof of the relevant market in antitrust cases.

Of most significance is that the court ruled that parties must provide expert testimony for proof of the relevant market.

The opinion also affirmed the requirement that expert testimony used to prove the relevant market must satisfy the admissibility standards of both Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

All fields required

  5. Required

Only Law360 gives you:

Non-stop coverage of high-stakes litigation across 30 practices

Real-time tracking and reports on 10,000+ companies, firms and industries

Over 80,000 attorney profiles with neutral data collected from active lawsuits

Research tools to find cases, court documents, attorneys and companies

Customized feeds and alerts that can easily be shared with colleagues

In-depth expert analysis from high-profile attorneys at top firms

Access to our vault with over 75,000 original articles