Ariad: Sea Change Or Tempest In A Teapot?
This case caps years of debate, both within the Federal Circuit as well as among scholars and commentators, concerning what appears to be a simple question: Does — or should — 35 U.S.C. § 112 include an independent requirement that an inventor must include in his or her patent specification a written description of the invention?
This article explores the possible consequences...
To view the full article, register now.