A Response To 'NuvaRing Meets Iqbal'

Law360, New York (February 04, 2010, 2:02 PM ET) -- This article was written in response to a recent Law360 guest article — NuvaRing Meets Iqbal, by Paul D. Rheingold and Hunter J. Shkolnik of Rheingold Valet Rheingold Shkolnik & McCartney LLP — published Jan. 6, 2010, on Product Liability Law360.

Rheingold and Shkolnik argue that MDL master complaints should not be dismissed for failing to meet the Supreme Court’s pleading requirements under Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009).

Our position...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

All fields required

  5. Required

Only Law360 gives you:

Non-stop coverage of high-stakes litigation across 30 practices

Real-time tracking and reports on 10,000+ companies, firms and industries

Over 80,000 attorney profiles with neutral data collected from active lawsuits

Research tools to find cases, court documents, attorneys and companies

Customized feeds and alerts that can easily be shared with colleagues

In-depth expert analysis from high-profile attorneys at top firms

Access to our vault with over 75,000 original articles