Making Sense Of SEC’s NOBO-OBO Rules

Law360, New York (February 19, 2010, 4:33 PM ET) -- The past several months have seen a resurgence in the years-long debate over proxy mechanics.

The debate has focused on the desire of issuers to have more direct channels of communication with their retail shareholders, and a dissatisfaction with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “NOBO-OBO” rules. The SEC has indicated that it will publish a concept release seeking input on these issues soon.

In response to questions about the somewhat complicated regulatory context for communicating with retail shareholders, we have prepared the below answers in...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

You must correct or enter the following before you can submit this form:

All fields required

  1. Required

Only Law360 gives you:

Non-stop coverage of high-stakes litigation across 30 practices

Real-time tracking and reports on 10,000+ companies, firms and industries

Over 80,000 attorney profiles with neutral data collected from active lawsuits

Research tools to find cases, court documents, attorneys and companies

Customized feeds and alerts that can easily be shared with colleagues

In-depth expert analysis from high-profile attorneys at top firms

Access to our vault with over 75,000 original articles