Testimony Cut Again In Wood Herron Malpractice Suit

Law360, New York (August 30, 2010, 2:30 PM EDT) -- Finding that the inventor of a weed trimmer guard was not qualified to provide expert testimony in his patent malpractice suit against intellectual property boutique Wood Herron & Evans LLP, a federal judge has granted summary judgment to the firm for the second time.

In a reconsideration ruling issued Thursday, Judge Danny C. Reeves of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky ruled that while an expert proposed by plaintiff Steven E. Byrne was actually qualified to give testimony on the standard of...
To view the full article, register now.