Law360, New York (November 16, 2010, 2:35 PM ET) -- A black man whose position with BP North America Pipelines Inc. was eliminated three months before he was eligible for retirement benefits has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a lower court's decision to exclude evidence that his boss routinely fired black workers and encouraged a culture of discrimination.
The Supreme Court must clarify the admissibility of circumstantial evidence in discriminatory workplace claims — so-called me too evidence — which lower courts have interpreted in wildly different ways since the high court’s 2008 ruling in...
High Court Asked To Clarify Use Of 'Me Too' Evidence
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
