Law360, New York (May 19, 2011, 3:13 PM ET) -- On May 5, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Pooshs v. Philip Morris USA Inc., the latest in a line of cases addressing how statutes of limitations should apply in cases where a plaintiff alleges delayed discovery of only one of multiple claims or injuries.
The latest battle again involved Philip Morris, a named defendant in the three most recent Supreme Court cases implicating this issue, including Boeken v. Philip Morris USA Inc. and Grisham v. Philip Morris USA Inc. What might seem lost...
Reading Between The Lines: Pooshs V. Philip Morris
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
