Marvell Can't Nix Claims In Disk IP Row With University
U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer said it was a “close call” but ultimately denied Marvell's motion for summary judgment because the patents-in-suit are not anticipated under 35 U.S.C. 102. The claims in the two Carnegie patents aren't disclosed in the so-called Seagate patent issued in 2001 which relates to a data detector invention, the judge said....

