Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

Case Study: Starbucks V. Wolfe's

Law360, New York (January 13, 2012, 12:47 PM EST) -- Stating that the anti-dilution law should be used as "a scalpel, not a battle axe," U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the Southern District of New York once again found that Starbucks Corp. failed to prove that the famous "Starbucks" trademark was likely to be diluted by the use of the marks "Charbucks Blend," "Mr. Charbucks" and "Mister Charbucks" on dark roasted coffee. In her Dec. 23, 2011, opinion, she ordered that judgment be entered in favor of the defendant, Wolfe's Borough Coffee Inc., and that the long-running case be closed....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!