Does A Lump Sum Payment Cover All Future Patent Use?

Law360, New York (June 6, 2012, 1:18 PM EDT) -- If an accused infringer has evidence supporting that a hypothetical negotiation would have resulted in a lump sum payment that would be the total payment that the patent owner would ever receive for the patent, the accused infringer should present this evidence at trial and provide the jury with instructions and a verdict form that allow the jury to award a lump sum royalty that encompasses full relief, including relief for post-trial sales. Post-verdict relief and additional litigation may be avoided if a court determines that the jury award properly encompasses all relief that the patent owner is ever entitled to....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!