Salazar V. Ramah — A Victory For Government Contractors

Law360, New York (June 28, 2012, 1:19 PM EDT) -- By a narrow 5-4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court held on June 18 that a federal department or agency must fulfill each of its contractual obligations to pay a contractor's costs under a cost-type contract despite the department's competing internal priorities for allocation of the same congressionally appropriated funds. See Salazar v. Ramah, No. 11-551 (June 18, 2012). This rationale applies even when the appropriation act and the contract carries the explicit disclaimer, "subject to the availability of appropriations."...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!