Q&A With Gibson Dunn's Sean Royall

Law360, New York (October 8, 2007, 12:00 AM EDT) -- The Robinson-Patman Act serves no salutary purpose and should be done away with, says Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP's Sean Royall in our series of chats with high-profile antitrust lawyers.

Q. What attracted you to antitrust as a practice area? And what keeps you interested?

A. I majored in economics in college and chose the University of Chicago for law school largely because of its reputation for "law and economics" (still a relatively new concept at that time). My plan then was to get a Ph.D....
To view the full article, register now.