The Practical Lessons Of Myriad

Law360, New York (September 4, 2012, 11:56 AM EDT) -- On Aug. 16, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued what may be the final decision in the prominent case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Inc., No. 2010-1406 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2012). The decision is the culmination of a focused effort to reverse the policy of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that isolated polynucleotide molecules ("IPMs") are eligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (a policy that has been tacitly followed by the courts). As many commentators have observed, this effort has failed. The majority of the three-judge panel held that IPMs are like any other chemical and are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!