Broadening Application Of The Filed Rate Doctrine

Law360, New York (September 13, 2012, 2:01 PM EDT) -- Ninety years ago Justice Louis Brandeis delivered the opinion in Keogh v. Northwestern Railway Co., 260 U.S. 156 (1922), and based on four policy reasons, concluded that a rate filed and approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission was not subject to collateral attack by way of a Sherman Act treble damages action. Historically, the filed rate doctrine has been limited to common carriers and utilities regulated by federal agencies under comprehensive statutes and regulations, which provide remedies for harmed consumers and require regulator rate-setting. See Ark. La. Gas Co. v. Hall, 453 U.S. 571, 577 (1981)....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!