12(b)(6) Motions: Another Arrow In Patentee's Quiver

Law360, New York (September 21, 2012, 1:32 PM EDT) -- A frequently employed tool in patent litigation is a motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim of infringement. These types of motions, often based on an argument that a plaintiff's bare-bones allegations of both direct and indirect infringement fail to meet the pleading standards articulated in the U.S. Supreme Court's Twombly and Iqbal decisions, have gained popularity in recent years. Anecdotally, it seems that they are most often used in response to complaints filed against multiple defendants by nonpracticing entities. In such cases, it is the rare group of defendants that does not include at least one party willing to take a crack at such a motion, even if only as a delay tactic....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!