Law360, New York (September 26, 2012, 2:37 PM EDT) -- Within the past 12 months, California's appellate courts, including its highest court of appeal, the California Supreme Court, issued three opinions important to the toxic tort practitioner: O'Neil v. Crane (holding that in asbestos litigation, equipment manufacturers are not liable for injuries caused by asbestos-containing replacement parts); Davis v. Foster Wheeler (holding that contradictory deposition testimony from the same witness does not create a fact dispute for summary judgment purposes and that contractors who merely work with asbestos containing products on multi-employer jobsites are not liable for exposures to other employees) and Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions (holding that a personal injury plaintiff may only recover as past medical expenses amounts actually paid or incurred under the terms of her medical insurance policy)....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
