Antitrust Statute Of Limitations: A Limit Only In Theory

Law360, New York (February 25, 2013, 12:30 PM ET) -- In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), the U.S. Supreme Court raised the federal pleading standard, holding that a complaint must allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that a claim is “plausible on its face.”[1] In the wake of this decision, there was a great deal of speculation about the effect of Twombly on Sherman Act litigation. Some pundits suggested this new pleading standard would prevent implausible allegations from unjustifiably draining a defendant’s resources by allowing courts to dismiss baseless claims early.

Chief among...
To view the full article, register now.

DEWEY LIVE BLOG

Follow our exclusive coverage of the trial of the year:

Catch up on the Dewey trial here