Antitrust Statute Of Limitations: A Limit Only In Theory

Law360, New York (February 25, 2013, 12:30 PM ET) -- In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), the U.S. Supreme Court raised the federal pleading standard, holding that a complaint must allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that a claim is “plausible on its face.”[1] In the wake of this decision, there was a great deal of speculation about the effect of Twombly on Sherman Act litigation. Some pundits suggested this new pleading standard would prevent implausible allegations from unjustifiably draining a defendant’s resources by allowing courts to dismiss baseless claims early.

Chief among...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required