Confusion Over Patent Infringement Pleading And Form 18

Law360, New York (April 2, 2013, 11:11 AM EDT) -- The oft-discussed U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Twombly and Iqbal have raised the bar for pleading in federal courts, from mere "notice pleading," to requiring claimants to state a "plausible" claim for relief.[1] Many district courts have found this elevated pleading standard difficult to reconcile with some of the sample pleading forms in the appendix to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly the relatively bare-bones Form 18 sample complaint for patent infringement.[2] The district court in Tyco Fire, for example, observed that "the forms purporting to illustrate what level of pleading is required do not reflect the sea change of Twombly and Iqbal."[3]...

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!