Law360, New York ( June 18, 2013, 5:54 PM EDT) -- Adding to a growing body of case law in favor of bankrupt bank-holding companies, the District Court for the Southern District of California recently held that a tax refund due to Imperial Capital Bancorp Inc., a bank-holding company, was property of its bankruptcy estate and not property of its subsidiary bank as a result of a prepetition tax allocation agreement (TAA) entered into between the holding company and the bank. Imperial Capital Bancorp Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In re: Imperial Capital Bancorp Inc.), (S.D. Cal. May 16, 2013)....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
A Law360 subscription includes features such as
- Daily newsletters
- Expert analysis
- Mobile app
- Advanced search
- Judge information
- Real-time alerts
- 450K+ searchable archived articles
And more!
Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.