Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

Putting Daubert In Proper Perspective

Law360, New York (August 1, 2013, 1:19 PM EDT) -- Recently, the federal circuits resolved a long-standing misconception about the rule regarding admissibility of expert testimony as set forth by Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharm. Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993). Daubert determined, "'General acceptance' is not a necessary precondition to the admissibility of scientific evidence under the Federal Rules of Evidence." The U.S. Supreme Court found that such a test would not allow for an expert to rely on evolving, novel scientific issues....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!