Fed. Circ. Revives Plantronics Earbud Patent Suit
The appeals court said the lower judge had found Plantronics’ patent was an obvious combination of pre-existing technologies before properly considering the so-called objective evidence of nonobviousness.
This kind of evidence — like previous inventors' failed attempt to combine the prior art, or that Aliph had profited by copying the patent — had been...
To view the full article, register now.