The Flaws In Ga.'s Insured V. Insured Exclusion Ruling

Law360, New York (September 30, 2013, 12:40 PM ET) -- In a recent decision for insured directors and officers of banks and other companies under their directors and officers insurance policies, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia held that the “insured v. insured” exclusion of a failed bank’s D&O policy barred coverage for the bank’s officers in an action brought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in its capacity as the bank’s receiver.

The result in St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Miller, et al., 2:12-CV-0225-RWS (Aug. 19, 2013), is...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required