Law360, New York (February 28, 2008, 12:00 AM ET) -- Following a major setback last month in a proposed class action over alleged price-fixing in the dynamic random access memory market, the plaintiffs' attorneys have filed a slightly amended complaint, as they await a chance to appeal a judge's ruling.
In January, U.S. District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton of the Northern District of California dismissed a majority of indirect purchaser antitrust claims made by customers who purchased computers containing DRAM technology, ruling that they lacked antitrust standing. That ruling would knock out about 90% of the...
DRAM Antitrust Plaintiffs File 3rd Amended Complaint
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
