Calif. Unconscionability Analysis In Conflict With FAA

Law360, New York (November 20, 2013, 7:21 PM EST) -- The California Supreme Court has a long history of inventing new rules to invalidate consumer and employment arbitration agreements. Most notably, in 2005, that court announced a new unconscionability rule — the discover bank doctrine — that effectively blocked enforcement of every consumer arbitration agreement that did not permit class procedures. But the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion held that the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") preempted the discover bank rule....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!