Union Neutrality Challenge Faces Skepticism In High Court

Law360, New York (November 13, 2013, 8:30 PM ET) -- The argument that an employer's agreement to remain neutral on union organizing efforts is a “thing of value” that could violate anti-bribery law encountered skepticism in the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday in a union and a worker’s dispute over a neutrality deal.

Wednesday's oral arguments stemmed from Unite Here Local 355's appeal of an Eleventh Circuit ruling reviving a lawsuit brought by dog track worker Martin Mulhall, who said the deal was unlawful. Attorneys say the case could have major implications for the ability of...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required