Calif. High Court Says Prescription Fee Disclosure Law OK

Law360, Washington (December 19, 2013, 7:22 PM ET) -- California’s highest court on Thursday ruled that a state law requiring drug claim processors to compile and transmit pharmacy fee information to clients does not unlawfully compel speech, dealing a blow to the claims of several pharmacy benefit managers in a related case.

In a published opinion, the California Supreme Court ruled that although Civil Code section 2527 — which requires prescription drug claims processors to compile and summarize pharmacy fee information and transmit it to their clients — does implicate the right to free speech...
To view the full article, register now.

Documents

Related

Sections

Case Information

Case Title

Beeman, et al v. Anthem Prescription, et al


Case Number

07-56692

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

November 19, 2007


Case Title

Jerry Beeman, et al v. TDI Managed Care, et al


Case Number

07-56693

Court

Appellate - 9th Circuit

Nature of Suit

3890 Other Statutory Actions

Date Filed

November 19, 2007

Law Firms

Companies