What Bazaarvoice Tells Us About Section 7 Litigation

Law360, New York (January 14, 2014, 9:33 PM ET) -- On Jan. 8, 2014, the U.S. Department of Justice prevailed in its challenge to Bazaarvoice’s consummated $168 million acquisition of PowerReviews.[1] The United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that Bazaarvoice’s June 2012 deal constituted the purchase of its “closest and only serious competitor” and violated Section 7 of the Clayton Act.[2]

In reaching its decision, the court thoroughly applied the 2010 horizontal merger guidelines and relied heavily on premerger “hot documents” that reflected closeness of competition between the merged parties and...
To view the full article, take a free trial now.
Try Law360 for free for seven days
Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Required