Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Expert Analysis

Overlooked Problems With Induced Infringement

Law360, New York (July 11, 2014, 10:09 AM EDT) -- The focus of the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Limelight Networks Inc. v. Akamai Technologies Inc. has been on divided infringement, but there is another lesson from the case that might have a greater impact for practioners: the Supreme Court's refusal to expand the doctrine of induced infringement to cover all perceived bad acts. Although the Supreme Court may have stopped the expansion of induced infringement, it did not provide any guidance on the addressing the problems with induced infringement. Discussed below are the ways the courts have expanded induced infringement and some of the other problems induced infringement raises....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!