High Court's Sleight Of Hand In Bankruptcy Jurisdiction

Law360, New York (August 15, 2014, 1:18 PM EDT) -- Recently, much of the bankruptcy bar was focused on the U.S. Supreme Court and a pending decision in Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison,[1] which raised an important jurisdictional issue regarding whether parties may consent to bankruptcy court jurisdiction over noncore claims. However, the Supreme Court frustrated the bar's expectations, sidestepping the issue. Then while attention was riveted on Executive Benefits, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman,[2] addressing the parameters of personal jurisdiction....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!