Should PTAB Apply Broadest Reasonable Construction In IPR?

Law360, New York (September 22, 2014, 10:11 AM EDT) -- The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has published a "Request for Comments on Trial Proceedings Under the America Invents Act Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board," requesting written comments on or before Sept. 16, 2014. [1] One of the questions relates to the claim construction standard to be applied in inter partes review and/or covered business method proceedings.[2] Thus far, the PTAB has applied the "broadest reasonable interpretation" ("BRI") standard to IPR and CBM proceedings, except when a patent has expired.[3] A question raised in both proposed legislation and in PTAB proceedings is whether, or under what circumstances, the PTAB should employ the same standard for claim construction as district courts....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!