Exchange Act Does Not Prohibit Big Boy Letters

Law360, New York (December 16, 2014, 7:45 AM EST) -- Companies weighing the value of no-reliance clauses in agreements have good reason to include them, as federal courts continue to enforce disclaimers of reliance in contracts between sophisticated parties, including in so-called "Big Boy" letters.[1] A survey of the applicable law confirms that Section 29(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act ("Exchange Act"), which prohibits anticipatory waivers of compliance with applicable securities law, does not prohibit the use of Big Boy letters or other iterations of specific nonreliance provisions in agreements....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!