We Don't Know How Octane Fitness Applies To TM Cases

Law360, New York (December 8, 2014, 10:17 AM EST) -- Patent pirate. Patent dealer. The "scourge of technology." There seem to be more alternative monikers for so-called patent trolls than there are methods to deter them from bringing frivolous lawsuits. In theory, one potential deterrent has long been the patent code's fee-shifting provision — after all, potential plaintiffs ought to think twice about suing if bringing a meritless case could leave them paying the defendant's attorneys' fees. In practice, however, the onerous two-prong test that has historically been applied to determine whether a patent case met the "exceptional" criteria to allow a court to award fees to a prevailing defendant had rendered this particular potential deterrent a toothless tiger. In short, the (very) remote threat of fee-shifting offered virtually no disincentive against a patent troll asserting questionable claims in the hopes of extorting a lucrative settlement. Enter Octane Fitness....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Related Sections

Law Firms

Companies

Government Agencies

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!