Tracing Ohio's Evolution On The Component Parts Doctrine

Law360, New York (December 15, 2014, 10:50 AM EST) -- Although component part manufacturers such as Takata Corp. have recently been the subject of significant scrutiny, recent decisions from Ohio appellate courts remind us of the general rule that a component manufacturer should not be held liable for a defect in a completed product. Two exceptions to the component parts doctrine arise when: (1) the component part itself is defective or dangerous or (2) the component part manufacturer constructs or assembles the completed product or substantially participates in the design of the completed product. Even in light of those exceptions, however, a component manufacturer will not be held liable where the manufacturer of the completed product retains ultimate control over the design of the product including the integration of the component part into the final product....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!