Kansas Curbs Marketable Product Rule In O&G Royalty Cases

Law360, New York (July 13, 2015, 8:45 AM EDT) -- On July 3, 2015, the Kansas Supreme Court issued its long-awaited, unanimous decision in Fawcett v. Oil Producers Inc. of Kansas ("OPIK"), finding that the producer did not underpay royalties and rejecting the expansive application of the marketable product rule advanced by the class action plaintiffs. The court held that where an oil and gas producer sells natural gas at the wellhead to a gas gatherer under a "proceeds" lease providing for the payment of royalties based on sales "at the well," the producer has satisfied its duty to make the gas marketable. This Kansas case may influence other states that confront the identical issue to adopt a more pro-producer approach to the duty to market and make it easier for producers to defeat royalty owner class actions....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!